StaFiX Governance
StaFiX adopts a two-chamber governance model: a fast-path parameter council for urgent risk operations and a community chamber for strategic changes. StaFiX token holders participate in governance with transparent rationales and impact estimates.
The parameter council operates under narrow, reversible powers with post-hoc accountability for urgent risk management. The community chamber uses on-chain voting with audit trails and off-chain discussions for strategic decisions. Both chambers must publish rationales and impact estimates.
Parameter Council
- • Fast-path for urgent risk operations
- • Narrow, reversible powers
- • Post-hoc accountability
- • Emergency response capability
Community Chamber
- • Strategic protocol changes
- • On-chain voting with audit trails
- • Quorum and supermajority thresholds
- • Timelock and staged execution
Proposal Lifecycle
- Intent Discussion: Risk pre-check and community feedback
- On-chain Proposal: Capability flags and simulations
- Voting Period: Quorum and supermajority based on risk class
- Execution: Timelock and staged execution with monitoring
Governance Process
A transparent, community-driven process for making decisions about the StaFiX protocol
Community members create proposals for protocol changes
- •Minimum token threshold required to submit
- •Proposal must include detailed specification
- •Community discussion period of 3-7 days
- •Technical review by core contributors
Open forum discussion and feedback collection
- •Public discussion on governance forum
- •Technical feasibility assessment
- •Economic impact analysis
- •Community sentiment gathering
StaFiX holders vote on proposals using their tokens
- •Voting period: 48-72 hours
- •Quorum requirement based on proposal type
- •Supermajority required for high-risk changes
- •Transparent on-chain voting records
Approved proposals are implemented with timelock
- •24-48 hour timelock for security
- •Automated execution via smart contracts
- •Community monitoring during implementation
- •Post-implementation review and assessment
Governance Proposal Examples
Example types of proposals that will be voted on through the two-chamber governance model
Governance Launching with Testnet
The governance system will be activated during the testnet phase (2025 Q3). Token holders will be able to submit and vote on proposals once the protocol launches.
Risk Parameter Adjustment
Adjust risk parameters for conservative vaults based on market conditions
New AVS Integration
Integrate additional Actively Validated Services for enhanced yield opportunities
Yield Distribution Update
Update yield distribution mechanisms for Yield Claim token holders
Parameter Council Proposals
- • Risk parameter adjustments
- • Emergency protocol pauses
- • Validator set updates
- • Fee structure modifications
Community Chamber Proposals
- • New chain integrations
- • Treasury allocation decisions
- • Protocol upgrade proposals
- • Strategic partnerships
Learn more about how to participate in governance
Participate in Governance
Join the StaFiX community in shaping the future of multi-chain liquid staking
Governance Launching with Protocol
Connect your wallet once the protocol launches to participate in governance decisions. The governance system will be activated during the testnet phase in 2025 Q3.
Use your tokens to vote on active governance proposals after protocol launch
Requires: Token holdings
Submit new proposals for protocol improvements and changes
Requires: Minimum token threshold
Participate in community discussions about protocol development
Open to all community members
Delegate your voting power to trusted community members
Requires: Token holdings
Why Participate in Governance?
Shape the Protocol
Have a direct say in protocol decisions and future direction
Transparent Process
All proposals and votes are on-chain with full audit trails
Community Driven
Join a community committed to decentralized decision-making